Agile leadership: How HR managers strengthen teams in uncertain times
In a world characterized by constant change — whether through digital transformation, hybrid work or the introduction of AI — traditional, hierarchical leadership models are increasingly reaching their limits. Companies are looking for new ways to remain flexible, responsive, and innovative. Right here comes agile leadership into the game.
But what is really behind this term, which is used so often? Is it just a matter of introducing Scrum or Kanban, or is there more behind it? This article highlights why agile leadership goes far beyond methods, which principles shape it and how HR managers can achieve a decisive competitive advantage through an objective, scientifically based approach.
What is agile leadership? Definition and delimitation
Agile leadership is a leadership style, which enables teams to be successful in a dynamic and complex environment. In contrast to classic, plan-based leadership, which aims at control, hierarchy and stability, agile leadership focuses on the following core characteristics:
- Decentralization of decisions: Responsibility is delegated to the teams.
- Focus on people and interaction: The well-being and cooperation of employees are paramount.
- Adaptability: Managers react flexibly to changes instead of sticking strictly to plans.
Iterative work: Results are delivered in short cycles to enable continuous feedback.
Agile leadership is not seen as a rigid set of rules, but as an attitude. It is the “why” behind agile methods and provides the cultural framework in which agile practices (such as Scrum or Kanban) can work in the first place.
Classic vs. agile leadership: A paradigm shift
The differences between these two management styles are fundamental and are reflected in daily work:
This change requires managers to think differently and gain new skills. The journey from inspector to coach is demanding and often requires a realignment of one's own behavior.
The 9 most important principles of agile leadership
Agile leadership is based on fixed principles that lay the foundation for successful implementation. They guide managers to move away from rigid hierarchies and promote a culture of adaptation and learning.
- Trust & Psychological Safety: The foundation of agile teams. Real innovation can only be achieved in an environment where employees dare to take risks, make mistakes and share their opinions.
- Transparency: Information is freely available and decisions are comprehensible. This creates clarity and enables teams to act independently.
- Empowerment & autonomy: Give teams the freedom and responsibility to work independently. Managers set the framework and set the goals — the teams themselves define the path to achieve them.
- Feedback & Retrospective: Continuous, regular feedback is essential. Retrospectives are fixed rituals to reflect and improve collaboration and processes.
- Focus on added value: Instead of working through rigid plans, the focus is on what brings the greatest benefit to the customer or the company.
- Learn & experiment: Mistakes are seen as an opportunity to learn. Agile leadership encourages experimentation and continuous development.
- Servant Leadership: The manager serves the team by removing obstacles, providing resources, and helping the team achieve goals.
- Co-creativity: Problems are not solved by the manager alone, but together with the team. The best solutions are created through dialogue.
- Leadership is situational: An agile management style doesn't mean that everyone always does the same thing. Depending on the situation and the team's level of maturity, the manager must adapt their style. Situational leadership is being reinterpreted in this context.
These principles are not just theoretical concepts, but can also be translated into concrete behaviours and methods.
Methods and tools for practice
Agile leadership only becomes tangible through the practical application of methods and rituals. They help managers integrate the principles into everyday life.
- Daily Stand-Ups (Daily Scrum): Short, daily meetings to sync progress, identify obstacles, and increase transparency.
- Retrospectives: Regular team meetings to reflect on cooperation, learn and derive concrete improvement measures.
- 1:1 calls: Do not serve as control, but as coaching and support conversations to promote individual development and wellbeing.
- Delegation Board/Delegation Poker: A playful way to determine, together with the team, the level of delegation for specific decisions or tasks. This creates clarity and trust.
- Decision framework (e.g. RACI matrix, RAPID): Structured methods for clarifying roles and responsibilities when making decisions in order to avoid blockages.
Choosing the right method depends heavily on the respective team, their level of maturity and goals.
The challenges of agile leadership and the role of HR
The introduction of agile management concepts is often associated with major challenges. HR managers play a key role in this, as they must not only support implementation, but also create the necessary framework conditions.
Typical problems and so-called “anti-patterns” include:
- The Cargo Cult Approach: Methods are adopted without understanding the underlying principles (e.g. daily standups without real exchange).
- Micromanagement: Leaders relinquish responsibility but step back in with every little thing. This undermines the trust and autonomy of the team.
- Lack of skill set: Many managers lack the psychological knowledge and soft skills to act as coaches and enablers.
- Unclear goals and structures: If the overall goal is missing, even an empowered team cannot make meaningful decisions.
The biggest gap that often occurs here is that of objectivity. How can HR ensure that managers have the necessary competencies for this change? And how can you make the success of agile leadership measurable without falling into the old control trap?
The role of aptitude diagnostics: Identifying and developing agile leadership skills
One of the biggest challenges for HR managers and companies is identifying who has the potential for agile leadership. How can you get the necessary skills How to objectively measure self-organization, communication skills, empathy and conflict resolution?
Here is the scientifically based Aptitude diagnostics into the game. Traditional methods such as personal interviews or testimonials are often used by cognitive distortions (bias) influences, which significantly limits objectivity. One digital platform With scientifically based assessments, we can offer a fair, efficient and valid alternative here.
How Aivy supports the search for agile leaders
Aivy's digital platform uses Game-based assessments and scientifically based questionnairesto objectively measure the relevant competencies for agile leadership. For example, the following abilities are diagnosed:
- Agile mindset: The ability to deal with uncertainty and an open attitude towards change.
- Decisiveness: The willingness to take responsibility and make decisions even in complex situations.
- Willingness to trust: The ability to relinquish control and delegate responsibility.
- Strong communication skills: The ability to clearly formulate feedback and to coach effectively.
Existing managers can also use a test profile to determine their individual strengths and development potential with regard to agile leadership. This then serves as a basis for tailor-made training or coaching. At the same time, the data-based profiles make it possible to objectively determine which employees from your own company have the potential to take on agile leadership roles. HR thus also promotes internal mobility.
Practical example:
A practical example shows how Persona service used Aivy's solution for team leader positions in various locations to objectify their own recruiting. By using a digital platform, the company was not only able to speed up its selection processes, but also create a more objective basis for decision-making — a crucial prerequisite for identifying agile talent. \
Conclusion: The future of leadership is agile — and scientifically based
Agile leadership is much more than a short-lived trend. It is a necessary evolutionary answer to an increasingly complex working world. But without the right attitude and the right skills, the introduction of agile methods is often ineffective. HR managers are faced with the task of actively shaping and accompanying this change.
The solution lies in combining agile principles with objective, scientifically based aptitude diagnostics. A digital platform, such as Aivy's, can help identify and promote the necessary competencies among candidates and employees. This not only makes recruiting more efficient, but also the development of management teams strategically and data-driven. This is how a purely cultural change becomes measurable, sustainable success.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
- What is the difference between agile leadership and agile methods? Agile methods (e.g. Scrum, Kanban) are the “what” — the specific procedures and rituals. Agile leadership is the “how” — the underlying attitude and the principles that make these methods effective in the first place.
- Can everyone learn agile leadership? Anyone can understand and apply the principles. However, the skills and personality traits required for this vary. A potential analysis helps to identify individual strengths and areas of development.
- How do you measure the success of agile leadership? The success of agile leadership is measured not only by key figures such as productivity. Psychological safety, employee engagement, team satisfaction and the ability to react quickly to market changes are also important indicators.
- Is agile leadership also suitable for large companies or just for start-ups? Agile leadership is relevant for companies of all sizes. Scaling frameworks such as SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) or LeSS (Large-Scale Scrum) show how agile principles can also be implemented in large organizations.
- What is servant leadership? Servant leadership is a management style in which the manager primarily serves the well-being of the team. She sees her job as removing obstacles for the team, supporting them and helping them to succeed instead of exercising power.
- How can the HR department support the introduction of agile leadership? HR can support by promoting the right mindset, training managers in the appropriate competencies, adapting corporate culture, and providing objective diagnostic tools for selection and development.
- How long does it take to implement agile leadership? Implementing agile leadership is an ongoing process that requires time and patience. It starts with small steps and evolves iteratively.
Sources:
- Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2021). Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study in a Large Italian Consulting Firm. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34 (4), 413—435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09389-9
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2), 350—383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
- Grimm, J., & Tokarski, K.O. (2022). Leadership in agile organizational structures: Management approaches, tools and the role of employees in agile leadership as a form of resilience. In J. Schellinger, K.O. Tokarski, & I. Kissling-Naef (Eds. ), Resilience through organizational development (pp. 177—195). Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36022-1_10
- Hu, J., Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T.N. (2025). When Leaders Heed the Lessons of Mistakes: Linking Leaders' Recall of Learning from Mistakes to Expressed Humility. Personnel Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12570Luo, J., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Song, L.J. (2022). Humble leadership and its outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 32 (5), 100880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980322
- Porkodi, S. (2024). The effectiveness of agile leadership in practice: A comprehensive meta-analytic review of the impact of agile leadership on organizational outcomes. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 20 (2), 117—138. https://doi.org/10.7341/20242026
- Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 262—274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
Make a better pre-selection — even before the first interview
In just a few minutes, Aivy shows you which candidates really fit the role. Beyond resumes based on strengths.
