Planned problem solving is a Dimension of cognitive ability. It describes a person's tendency to find good solutions by planning very carefully right away rather than by trying things out several times (Funke & Fritz 1995).

Everyone approaches problems differently. While the one himself carefully developed plan, sampled The other immediately different ways out. For simple problems, you often find the desired solution by trying things out, but with increasing complexity Without a good plan, you quickly lose track of things. Here comes the planned problem resolution into the game.

‍ This allows you to solve a person's planned problem on a continuum between the two poles try it out and scheme Classify. The value of each person can therefore be located at one point on the following scale:

try it out

People who are good Solutions to problems are more likely to be solved by trying them out several times prefer work environments in which an open error culture is more likely to be lived and mistakes are understood as an opportunity to learn.

Especially in activities with less complex tasks, through trial and error A good solution can often be achieved faster than through precise planning, such as artist or Interior designer.

scheme

People who are good Solutions to problems rather through precise planning prefer working environments in which several steps must be thought through in advance in order to systematically complete complex tasks.

Especially in activities with complex, safety-related or cost-intensive tasks Is precise planning important because errors entail a high safety or cost risk, such as Engineer or medical.

Benefits in a professional context

As you can see, it hangs best cast for a vacancy depends not only on the person's ability to solve the problem in a planned way, but also on the Vacancy tasks.

If the job focuses on quickly testing different solutions, solving problems through trial and error is more helpful. If, on the other hand, it involves complex tasks where every mistake is expensive, the problem solution should follow a planned structure.

It becomes clear that planned problem solving is of different importance in different jobs. It is therefore all the more important to find the employee who ideal form for the planned problem solution has for a job.

How do you record planned problem solving?

Heard planned problem resolution about the strengths of your applicants?

With our Game-based assessment “Impostor” Find out in the blink of an eye. This gives users only a few seconds to convert different towers. However, you won't get far without good planning.

Sources

• Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005). Current Research on Routine Decision Making: Advances and Prospects. The routines of decision making, 359-376.
• Duncker, K. (1935). On the psychology of productive thinking. [The psychology of productive thought]. Jumper.
• English, L.D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children's problem-posing abilities. Educational studies in mathematics, 34 (3), 183-217.
• Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J.A., & Posner, M.I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9 (2), 288-307.
• Funke, J., & Fritz, A. (1995). About planning, problem solving and action.
• Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Wüstenberg, S., Sonnleitner, P., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2013). A multitrait—multimethod study of assessment instruments for complex problem solving. Intelligence, 41 (5), 579-596.
• Mainert, J., Niepel, C., Murphy, K.R., & Greiff, S. (2019). The incremental contribution of complex problem-solving skills to the prediction of job level, job complexity, and salary. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34 (6), 825-845.
• Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9 (3), 185-211.
• Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. Organization of Memory, 1, 381-403.
• Zeidner, Moshe, Gerald Matthews, and Richard D. Roberts. “Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: A Critical Review.” Applied Psychology 53.3 (2004): 371-399.